From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Latimore v. Santiago

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Nov 29, 2010
Civ. Action No. 10-1231 (EGS) (D.D.C. Nov. 29, 2010)

Opinion

Civ. Action No. 10-1231 (EGS).

November 29, 2010


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On May 3, 2010 plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this action in Superior Court alleging her employer made false accusations against her. On July 21, 2010, defendant removed the case to this Court, and on July 27, 2010 defendant filed a motion to dismiss. Doc. Nos. 1, 3.

On August 30, 2010, the court issued an order in accordance with Fox v. Strickland, 827 F.2d 507 (D.C. Cir. 1988). Doc. No. 6. The order advised plaintiff that if she failed to respond to defendant's motion the court could treat the motion as conceded and enter judgment in favor of defendant pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(b). Rule 7(b) states, in relevant part, that if a memorandum of points and authorities is not filed, "the Court may treat the motion as conceded." LCvR 7(b).

Plaintiff has not filed a memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss. Consequently, the court will deem the motion as conceded and DISMISS this action without prejudice to refiling. An appropriate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.

November 29, 2010


Summaries of

Latimore v. Santiago

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Nov 29, 2010
Civ. Action No. 10-1231 (EGS) (D.D.C. Nov. 29, 2010)
Case details for

Latimore v. Santiago

Case Details

Full title:JANIS C. LATIMORE, Plaintiff, v. MARIA SANTIAGO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Nov 29, 2010

Citations

Civ. Action No. 10-1231 (EGS) (D.D.C. Nov. 29, 2010)