From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Latham v. West Corporation

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Nov 24, 2009
No. CV-08-2323-PHX-DGC (D. Ariz. Nov. 24, 2009)

Opinion

No. CV-08-2323-PHX-DGC.

November 24, 2009


ORDER


Sheila Latham commenced this employment discrimination action by filing a pro se complaint against her former employer, West Corporation (a/k/a West Direct II, Inc.). Dkt. #1. Plaintiff has filed a request for a jury trial (Dkt. #31), which the Court will construe as a demand for a jury trial under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The question of whether Plaintiff is entitled to a jury trial, and on what issues, will be addressed during pretrial proceedings if the case is not otherwise resolved through settlement or the resolution of dispositive motions. The Court will deny Plaintiff's request to the extent it may be construed as motion for a jury trial.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's request for a jury trial (Dkt. #31) is construed as a demand for a jury trial under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
2. Plaintiff's request is denied to the extent it may be construed as a motion.


Summaries of

Latham v. West Corporation

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Nov 24, 2009
No. CV-08-2323-PHX-DGC (D. Ariz. Nov. 24, 2009)
Case details for

Latham v. West Corporation

Case Details

Full title:Sheila Latham, Plaintiff, v. West Corporation, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Nov 24, 2009

Citations

No. CV-08-2323-PHX-DGC (D. Ariz. Nov. 24, 2009)