From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Latham v. The 1953 Tr.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 16, 2022
No. 20-CV-07102-LLS (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 16, 2022)

Opinion

20-CV-07102-LLS

06-16-2022

CHARLENE LATHAM, et al. Plaintiff, v. THE 1953 TRUST, et al. Defendant.


ORDER

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has received and reviewed Plaintiff's “Notice of Pending Case Action, ” dated June 10, 2022. (Docket entry no. 6.) To the extent Plaintiff seeks action based on her allegations of judicial misconduct, Plaintiff's request is improperly directed to the undersigned in her capacity as Chief Judge because such complaints are properly directed to the “clerk of the court of appeals for the circuit.” 28 U.S.C.A. § 351(a) (Westlaw through P.L. 117-102). To the extent Plaintiff is requesting that the undersigned make or alter any rulings in the above case, the request is denied. The Chief Judge does not have authority to take such action in cases assigned to other members of the Court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Latham v. The 1953 Tr.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 16, 2022
No. 20-CV-07102-LLS (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Latham v. The 1953 Tr.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLENE LATHAM, et al. Plaintiff, v. THE 1953 TRUST, et al. Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 16, 2022

Citations

No. 20-CV-07102-LLS (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 16, 2022)