From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Latham v. Corizon, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Feb 3, 2017
No. CV 15-00242-MCA-CG (D.N.M. Feb. 3, 2017)

Opinion

No. CV 15-00242-MCA-CG

02-03-2017

FRANK L. LATHAM, Plaintiff, v. CORIZON, LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition ("PFRD"), filed on October 24, 2016. (Doc. 111). In the PFRD, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint, (Doc. 92), be denied because Plaintiff fails to state a claim in the proposed amendments. The parties were notified that written objections to the PFRD were due within fourteen days. (Doc. 111 at 10). No objections have been filed, and the deadline of November 7, 2016, has passed. The recommendations of the Magistrate Judge are adopted by this Court.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint, (Doc. 92), is DENIED.

/s/_________

THE HONORABLE M. CHRISTINA ARMIJO

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Latham v. Corizon, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Feb 3, 2017
No. CV 15-00242-MCA-CG (D.N.M. Feb. 3, 2017)
Case details for

Latham v. Corizon, LLC

Case Details

Full title:FRANK L. LATHAM, Plaintiff, v. CORIZON, LLC, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Feb 3, 2017

Citations

No. CV 15-00242-MCA-CG (D.N.M. Feb. 3, 2017)