From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laster v. McDonough

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Dec 10, 2007
Case No.: 3:07cv37/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Dec. 10, 2007)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:07cv37/MCR/EMT.

December 10, 2007


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated October 22, 2007. The parties have been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, the objections thereto, and the supplement to the report and recommendation filed on December 5, 2007, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 19) is GRANTED.

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice as untimely.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Laster v. McDonough

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Dec 10, 2007
Case No.: 3:07cv37/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Dec. 10, 2007)
Case details for

Laster v. McDonough

Case Details

Full title:CANDACE B. LASTER, Petitioner, v. JAMES R. McDONOUGH, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Dec 10, 2007

Citations

Case No.: 3:07cv37/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Dec. 10, 2007)