Opinion
July 6, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Campbell, J., Lama, J.).
Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The amended judgment and the memorandum decision upon which it was based reflect that the trial court's distribution of marital property was made with due regard for the enumerated statutory factors (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5] [d]), and the court achieved a fair and equitable determination, supported by the evidence and based upon sound reasoning (see, Erdheim v. Erdheim, 119 A.D.2d 623, 626, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 607). Moreover, we discern no abuse of discretion with respect to the trial court's award of maintenance (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6]), child support (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [7]) or counsel fees (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237; Van Velsor v. Van Velsor, 120 A.D.2d 584).
The remaining contentions of the parties have been considered and are found to be without merit. Mollen, P.J., Bracken, Brown and Sullivan, JJ., concur.