From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lasko v. Get Fresh Sales, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 16, 2022
2:22-cv-01176 JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Dec. 16, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01176 JAD-BNW

12-16-2022

ZACHARY LASKO, an individual, Plaintiff, v. GET FRESH SALES, INC; EMPLOYEE(S)/AGENT(S) DOES 1-10; and ROE CORPORATIONS 11-20, inclusive Defendants.

ZACHARY LASKO KAMER ZUCKER ABBOTT Caitlyn M. Crisp Zachary Lasko Kaitlin H. Paxton KAMER ZUCKER ABBOTT SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Giovanna A. Ferrari Caitlyn M. Crisp


ZACHARY LASKO

KAMER ZUCKER ABBOTT

Caitlyn M. Crisp

Zachary Lasko

Kaitlin H. Paxton

KAMER ZUCKER ABBOTT

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

Giovanna A. Ferrari

Caitlyn M. Crisp

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

ECF No. 30

Pursuant to Rule 41(1)(1), Plaintiff Zachary Lasko (“Lasko”), pro se, and Defendant Get Fresh Sales, Inc. (“Get Fresh”), by and through its counsel of record Seyfarth Shaw LLP, hereby stipulate and request that the above-captioned case be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice.

Each party is to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs, except as otherwise provided.

ORDER

Based on the parties' stipulation [ECF No. 30] and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that THIS ACTION IS DISMISSED with prejudice, each side to bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.


Summaries of

Lasko v. Get Fresh Sales, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 16, 2022
2:22-cv-01176 JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Dec. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Lasko v. Get Fresh Sales, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ZACHARY LASKO, an individual, Plaintiff, v. GET FRESH SALES, INC…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 16, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01176 JAD-BNW (D. Nev. Dec. 16, 2022)