From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laski v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 11, 1983
96 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

July 11, 1983

Appeal from the Court of Claims, Moriarty, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Claimant was injured on July 8, 1979 when the "S" hook which attached the seat to the chain of a swing in Letchworth State Park disengaged from the chain while she was swinging. An inspection by the State on May 30, 1979 and by claimant before her use revealed no apparent defect in the swing. After a trial the Court of Claims determined that the State was not negligent and dismissed the claim. Claimant's argument that the Court of Claims erred in refusing to apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur and to infer negligence by the State is unavailing. We hold that the result would not be different if res ipsa loquitur, applied. "The rule of res ipsa loquitur, where it applies, relieves a plaintiff from the necessity for specifying the particular negligence of defendant (out of the many possible causes) which led to the occurrence." ( Koch v Melton Realty Corp., 52 A.D.2d 773, 774; see, also, Abbott v Page Airways, 23 N.Y.2d 502, 512-513). Here, the State may not be liable unless it had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous or defective condition of the swing (see Brooks v New York State Thruway Auth., 73 A.D.2d 767, 768, affd 51 N.Y.2d 892; cf. Harris v Village of East Hills, 41 N.Y.2d 446, 450; see, generally, 4B Warren's Negligence, Parks and Playgrounds, §§ 1.02, 2.01). The Court of Claims found that the State had no such notice and this finding is reasonable and fully supported by the evidence.


Summaries of

Laski v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 11, 1983
96 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Laski v. State

Case Details

Full title:COLEEN G. LASKI, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Claim No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 11, 1983

Citations

96 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Holland v. County of Monroe

In opposition to the motion for summary judgment, plaintiff relies on an EBT of defendant admitting that no…