From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laskey v. Proctor Gamble Company

U.S.
Jun 1, 2010
560 U.S. 937 (2010)

Opinion

No. 09–9828.

06-01-2010

Laurie Marie LASKEY, petitioner, v. PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY.


Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).

Justice STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, 113 S.Ct. 397, and cases cited therein.


Summaries of

Laskey v. Proctor Gamble Company

U.S.
Jun 1, 2010
560 U.S. 937 (2010)
Case details for

Laskey v. Proctor Gamble Company

Case Details

Full title:LAURIE M. LASKEY v. PROCTOR GAMBLE COMPANY

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 1, 2010

Citations

560 U.S. 937 (2010)
130 S. Ct. 3357
176 L. Ed. 2d 1242