From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lasker-Goldman Corp. v. Delma Engineering Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 2, 1969
32 A.D.2d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

April 2, 1969


Order entered December 17, 1968, granting plaintiff partial summary judgment against defendant under the first cause of action unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and the motion for summary judgment denied. Plaintiff's claim against defendant under this cause is based upon a straight indemnity clause whereby defendant agreed to hold plaintiff "harmless from all liability, loss, cost or damage" arising out of defendant's performance as plaintiff's subcontractor on a portion of certain construction work. Third parties have made claims for damage arising out of a mishap on the job, but, as far as is disclosed by the record, at the time of institution of the action, matters had not gone further than the filing of claims with plaintiff. This is not an action for declaration of the rights of the parties, but is, in effect, a claim over by plaintiff against defendant. Plaintiff is as yet entitled to nothing from defendant, and the cause is asserted prematurely.

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Eager, Capozzoli, Markewich and Steuer, JJ.


Summaries of

Lasker-Goldman Corp. v. Delma Engineering Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 2, 1969
32 A.D.2d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Lasker-Goldman Corp. v. Delma Engineering Corp.

Case Details

Full title:LASKER-GOLDMAN CORPORATION, Respondent, v. DELMA ENGINEERING CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 2, 1969

Citations

32 A.D.2d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
298 N.Y.S.2d 747

Citing Cases

Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth

A right to contribution or indemnification may be distinguished from a vested right. A vested right "has been…