From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lasher v. Miranda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 24, 2012
No. 2: 11-cv-2564 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2: 11-cv-2564 WBS KJN P

10-24-2012

GARY LASHER, Plaintiff, v. R. MIRANDA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's September 10, 2012 motion for transcripts. For the following reasons, this motion is denied.

In the pending motion, plaintiff requests that he be allowed to review the deposition transcript pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(e). On October 18, 2012, the undersigned ordered defendants to inform the court whether the deposition transcript contained plaintiff's request for review.

On October 23, 2012, defendants filed a response to the October 18, 2012 order. Defendants state that Tri County Court Reporting sent plaintiff a copy of the deposition transcript to review. Because plaintiff has received the deposition transcript to review, his motion for transcripts is denied as moot.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for transcripts (Dkt. No. 39) is denied.

______________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Lasher v. Miranda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 24, 2012
No. 2: 11-cv-2564 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Lasher v. Miranda

Case Details

Full title:GARY LASHER, Plaintiff, v. R. MIRANDA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 24, 2012

Citations

No. 2: 11-cv-2564 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2012)