From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lasher v. Miranda

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 2, 2013
2:11-cv-2564 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2013)

Opinion


GARY LASHER, Plaintiff, v. R. MIRANDA, et al., Defendants. No. 2:11-cv-2564 WBS KJN P United States District Court, E.D. California. December 2, 2013

          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 5, 2013, the court issued a pretrial order. The pretrial order directed plaintiff to file a supplemental pretrial statement within fourteen days demonstrating that his proposed inmate witnesses have actual knowledge of the relevant facts. The pretrial order also directed plaintiff to list his proposed exhibits in his supplemental pretrial statement. Fourteen days passed and plaintiff did not file a supplemental pretrial statement.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The pretrial order is amended to reflect that plaintiff shall call no inmate witnesses and shall offer no exhibits; and

2. Plaintiff's motion for witnesses (ECF No. 71) is denied to the extent plaintiff requests to call inmate witnesses.


Summaries of

Lasher v. Miranda

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 2, 2013
2:11-cv-2564 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2013)
Case details for

Lasher v. Miranda

Case Details

Full title:GARY LASHER, Plaintiff, v. R. MIRANDA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 2, 2013

Citations

2:11-cv-2564 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2013)