Lasharne W. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

10 Citing cases

  1. Laurie A. M v. Colvin

    1:24CV7 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 31, 2024)

    Lasharne W. v. Commissioner, Soc. Sec. Admin., No. CV 21-2603, 2023 WL 2414497, at *4 (D. Md. Mar. 8, 2023) (unpublished) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).

  2. Treadway v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin.

    1:23-cv-00250-KDB-WCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 15, 2024)

    (“a diagnosis of fibromyalgia...does not render a claimant per se disabled”); Lasharne W. v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, No. 21-cv-2603, 2023 WL 2414497, at *4 (D. Md. Mar. 8, 2023) (“[W]hile ‘a claimant's allegations about her pain may not be discredited solely because they are not substantiated by objective evidence of the pain itself or its severity, they need not be accepted to the extent they are inconsistent with the available evidence...'”) (internal citation omitted)).

  3. Tyler H. v. O'Malley

    CIVIL 23-1944-CDA (D. Md. Aug. 14, 2024)

    Lasharne W. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin., No. SAG-21-2603, 2023 WL 2414497, at *4 (D. Md. Mar. 8, 2023) (referring to Shelley C. 61 F.4th at 360)

  4. Soileau v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec.

    Civil Action EA-23-1404 (D. Md. Jul. 9, 2024)

    E.g., Krista M. v. Kijakazi, Civil Action No. MJM-21-2474, 2023 WL 2500306, at *8 (D. Md. Mar. 14, 2023) (finding the ALJ properly discounted opinions that were based largely on plaintiff's complaints and were inconsistent with much of the record); Lasharne W. v. Comm'r, Civil Action No. SAG-21-2603, 2023 WL 2414497, at *4 (D. Md. Mar. 8, 2023) (noting that weighing a claimant's subjective complaints against prior statements and medical records “remains permissible under Shelley C.”)

  5. [REDACTED] v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec.

    Civil Action EA-23-1404 (D. Md. Jul. 9, 2024)

    As this Court has held, an ALJ may weigh a claimant's subjective complaints against the rest of the record. E.g., Krista M. v. Kijakazi, Civil Action No. MJM-21-2474, 2023 WL 2500306, at *8 (D. Md. Mar. 14, 2023) (finding the ALJ properly discounted opinions that were based largely on plaintiff's complaints and were inconsistent with much of the record); Lasharne W. v. Comm'r, Civil Action No. SAG-21-2603, 2023 WL 2414497, at *4 (D. Md. Mar. 8, 2023) (noting that weighing a claimant's subjective complaints against prior statements and medical records “remains permissible under Shelley C.”).

  6. Clifford E. v. O'Malley

    1:23CV704 (M.D.N.C. Jun. 24, 2024)   Cited 4 times

    Lasharne W. v. Commissioner, Soc. Sec. Admin., No. CV 21-2603, 2023 WL 2414497, at *4 (D. Md. Mar. 8, 2023) (unpublished) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see also Anthony P. v. O'Malley, No. 1:22CV291, 2024 WL 965608, at *3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 6, 2024) (unpublished) (“[T]he ALJ in this case did not dismiss [the p]laintiff's subjective complaints based entirely upon the belief that they were not corroborated by the medical evidence; nor did the ALJ require that [the p]laintiff's subjective statements be validated by objective medical support.

  7. Mary W. v. O'Malley

    1:23CV128 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2024)   Cited 1 times

    Lasharne W. v. Commissioner, Soc. Sec. Admin., No. CV 21-2603, 2023 WL 2414497, at *4 (D. Md. Mar. 8, 2023) (unpublished) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)

  8. Alyssa W. v. O'Malley

    1:22CV919 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 2024)   Cited 2 times

    Lasharne W. v. Commissioner, Soc. Sec. Admin., No. CV 21-2603, 2023 WL 2414497, at *4 (D. Md. Mar. 8, 2023) (unpublished) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).

  9. Surrett v. O'Malley

    Civil Action 1:23-CV-00106-KDB (W.D.N.C. Jan. 17, 2024)   Cited 1 times

    ; Lasharne W. v.Commissioner, Social Security Administration, No. 21-cv-2603, 2023 WL 2414497, at *4 (D. Md. Mar. 8, 2023) (“[W]hile ‘a claimant's allegations about her pain may not be discredited solely because they are not substantiated by objective evidence of the pain itself or its severity, they need not be accepted to the extent they are inconsistent with the available evidence.

  10. Shelby D. v. Kijakazi

    Civil Action 3:22-cv-00234 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 29, 2023)   Cited 8 times
    Finding ALJ “properly noted that [the plaintiff]'s own subjective presentation in mental-status examinations was unremarkable”

    However, a diagnosis of fibromyalgia or depression does not render a claimant per se disabled. While “a claimant's allegations about her pain may not be discredited solely because they are not substantiated by objective evidence of the pain itself or its severity, they need not be accepted to the extent they are inconsistent with the available evidence, including objective evidence of the underlying impairment, and the extent to which that impairment can be reasonably be expected to cause the pain the claimant alleges she suffers.” Lasharne W. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin., 21-cv-2603, 2023 WL 2414497, at *4 (D. Md. Mar. 8, 2023). The ALJ expressly stated that his conclusions were not based exclusively on objective medical findings, but