LaSalle v. Sasol N. Am.

Full title: JOHN LASALLE, ET AL. v. SASOL NORTH AMERICA, ET AL.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Apr 24, 2020

DOCKET NO. 19-cv-1091 (W.D. La. Apr. 24, 2020)

Opinion

DOCKET NO. 19-cv-1091

04-24-2020

JOHN LASALLE, ET AL. v. SASOL NORTH AMERICA, ET AL.

JUDGE DOUGHTY

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons set forth above in this Court's Ruling,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Defendants Westlake and Phillips 66 [Doc. Nos. 9, 21] are DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss on Prescription filed by Westlake [Doc. No. 24] be DENIED AS MOOT as to the claims of Plaintiffs Marc Rachal, Marc Rigmaiden, and Willis Williams.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss on Prescription filed by Westlake [Doc. No. 24] is GRANTED as to the claims of Plaintiff John LaSalle. LaSalle's claims against all remining Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJDICE.

Monroe, Louisiana, this 24^th day of April, 2020.

/s/ _________

TERRY A. DOUGHTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE