Opinion
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-409
07-11-2012
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
Appeal From Orangeburg County
Olin D. Burgdorf, Master-in-Equity
AFFIRMED
Laura T. Toney, pro se, of Bishopville.
B. Rush Smith, III, Michael J. Anzelmo, and Betsy Polk, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM : Laura T. Toney appeals a master-in-equity's supplemental order and judgment of foreclosure and sale, arguing the master erred in failing to secure a court reporter for the foreclosure hearing and in violating her right to procedural due process. As to both of Toney's arguments, we affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: Herron v. Century BMW, 395 S.C. 461, 465, 719 S.E.2d 640, 642 (2011) ("At a minimum, issue preservation requires that an issue be raised to and ruled upon by the trial [court]."); SSI Med. Servs., Inc. v. Cox, 301 S.C. 493, 499, 392 S.E.2d 789, 793 (1990) (holding an issue raised to the trial court was not preserved for review when the trial court never ruled upon the issue and the issue was never raised in an appropriate post-trial motion); Germain v. Nichol, 278 S.C. 508, 509, 299 S.E.2d 335, 335 (1983) ("Appellant has the burden of providing this [c]ourt with a sufficient record upon which this [c]ourt can make its decision.").
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
AFFIRMED.
PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.