Opinion
2:19-cv-01667-ART-VCF
10-16-2023
LAS VEGAS SUN, INC., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. SHELDON ADELSON, an individual, and as the alter ego of News+Media Capital Group LLC, Las Vegas Review-Journal, Inc., and Interface Operations LLC dba Adfam; PATRICK DUMONT, an individual, and as alter ego of Las Vegas Review-Journal, Inc., News+Media Capital Group, LLC, and Interface Operations LLC dba Adfam; NEWS+MEDIA CAPITAL GROUP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; LAS VEGAS REVIEWJOURNAL, INC., a Delaware corporation; INTERFACE OPERATIONS LLC DBA ADFAM, a Delaware limited liability company and as alter ego of Las Vegas Review-Journal, Inc., and News+Media Capital Group, LLC; and DOES, I-X, inclusive, Defendants. LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Counterclaimant, v. LAS VEGAS SUN, INC. a Nevada corporation; BRIAN GREENSPUN, an individual and as the alter ego of Las Vegas Sun, Inc.; GREENSPUN MEDIA GROUP, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, as the alter ego of Las Vegas Sun, Inc., Counterclaim Defendants.
LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP E. Leif Reid, Kristen L. Martini, Nicole Scott, Lucy Crow, PISANELLI BICE PLLC James J. Pisanelli, Todd L. Bice, Jordan T. Smith, ALIOTO LAW FIRM Joseph M. Alioto, Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendants KEMP JONES LLP J. Randall Jones, Esq., Michael J. Gayan, Esq., Mona Kaveh, Esq., Amy M. Gallegos, Esq., Pro Hac Vice David R. Singer, Esq., Pro Hac Vice JENNER & BLOCK LLP Richard L. Stone, Esq., Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Defendants/ Counterclaimant
LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP E. Leif Reid, Kristen L. Martini, Nicole Scott, Lucy Crow,
PISANELLI BICE PLLC James J. Pisanelli, Todd L. Bice, Jordan T. Smith,
ALIOTO LAW FIRM Joseph M. Alioto, Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendants
KEMP JONES LLP J. Randall Jones, Esq., Michael J. Gayan, Esq., Mona Kaveh, Esq., Amy M. Gallegos, Esq., Pro Hac Vice David R. Singer, Esq., Pro Hac Vice JENNER & BLOCK LLP Richard L. Stone, Esq., Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Defendants/ Counterclaimant
ORDER GRANTING (ECF NO. 941)
JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE: (1) PLAINTIFF/COUNTERDEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS/ COUNTERCLAIMANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE NEW “REPLY” FACTS AND EXHIBITS OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY [ECF NO. 922]; (2) DEFENDANTS' AND COUNTERCLAIMANT'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF/ COUNTERDEFENDANTS' MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE
ANNE R. TRAUM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant LAS VEGAS SUN, INC., and Counterdefendants BRIAN GREENSPUN and GREENSPUN MEDIA GROUP, LLC (collectively the “Sun”), by and through their counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP, Pisanelli Bice PLLC, and the Alioto Law Firm, and Defendant/Counterclaimant LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL, INC., and Defendants NEWS+MEDIA CAPITAL GROUP LLC, ESTATE OF SHELDON ADELSON, PATRICK DUMONT, and INTERFACE OPERATIONS LLC DBA ADFAM (collectively the “RJ”), by and through their counsel of record, Kemp Jones, LLP, Jenner & Block LLP, and Richard L. Stone, Esq., hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. On September 27, 2023, the RJ filed its Defendants/Counterclaimant's Motion to Strike New “Reply” Facts and Exhibits or Alternatively, Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply (ECF No. 902) (“Motion to Strike”). ECF Nos. 922, 923. The Sun's Opposition to the RJ's Motion to Strike is currently due on October 11, 2023. The RJ's Reply in support of its Motion to Strike is currently due on October 18, 2023.
2. On September 27, 2023, the Sun filed its Plaintiff/Counterdefendants' Motion to Exceed Page Limitation for Responses to Defendants' and Counterclaimant's Evidentiary Objections to Documents Filed with Plaintiff/Counterdefendants' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 925. The RJ's Opposition to the Sun's Motion to Exceed Page Limitation is currently due on October 11, 2023.
3. The Parties jointly request a short extension of these briefing deadlines due to the Sun's counsel's family medical emergency that is impacting the current briefing schedule, as well as additional scheduling concerns on the part of the RJ. This is the first request made by the Parties to extend these deadlines.
4. The Parties request that the Sun's deadline to file its Opposition to the Motion to Strike be extended from October 11, 2023, to October 13, 2023, and the RJ's deadline to file its Reply in support of its Motion to Strike be extended from October 18, 2023, to October 20, 2023.
5. The Parties request that the RJ's deadline to file its Opposition to the Motion to Exceed Page Limitation be extended from October 11, 2023, to October 13, 2023.
6. These extensions will not be used as a basis to extend other deadlines or for any other relief. All other scheduling deadlines set in this matter shall remain in place.
IT IS SO ORDERED: .