Opinion
2:19-cv-01667-GMN-VCF
01-20-2022
LAS VEGAS SUN, INC., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. SHELDON ADELSON, an individual and as the alter ego of News+Media Capital Group LLC and as the alter ego of Las Vegas Review Journal, Inc.; PATRICK DUMONT, an individual; NEWS+MEDIA CAPITAL GROUP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES, I-X, inclusive, Defendants. LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Counterclaimant, v. LAS VEGAS SUN, INC., a Nevada corporation; BRIAN GREENSPUN, an individual and as the alter ego of Las Vegas Sun, Inc.; GREENSPUN MEDIA GROUP, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, as the alter ego of Las Vegas Sun, Inc., Counterclaim-Defendants.
J. RANDALL JONES, ESQ., MICHAEL J. GAYAN, ESQ., MONA KAVEH, ESQ., SBN KEMP JONES LLP RICHARD L. STONE, ESQ. DAVID R. SINGER, ESQ. AMY M. GALLEGOS, ESQ. JENNER & BLOCK LLP
J. RANDALL JONES, ESQ.,
MICHAEL J. GAYAN, ESQ.,
MONA KAVEH, ESQ., SBN
KEMP JONES LLP
RICHARD L. STONE, ESQ.
DAVID R. SINGER, ESQ.
AMY M. GALLEGOS, ESQ.
JENNER & BLOCK LLP
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 537), MOTION TO SEAL (ECF NO. 536), AND SEALED MOTION (ECF NO. 539) [ECF NO. 561] 1
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant LAS VEGAS SUN, INC., and Counterdefendants BRIAN GREENSPUN and GREENSPUN MEDIA GROUP, LLC (collectively the “Sun”), by and through their counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP, Pisanelli Bice PLLC, and the Alioto Law Firm, and Defendant/Counterclaimant LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL, INC., and Defendants NEWS+MEDIA CAPITAL GROUP LLC, SHELDON ADELSON, and PATRICK DUMONT (collectively the “Review-Journal”), by and through their counsel of record, Kemp Jones, LLP, and Jenner & Block LLP, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. On December 23, 2021, the Sun filed a Motion for Leave to File Documents Under Seal [Exhibits 3 and 4 to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Complaint] [ECF No. 536]; Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Complaint [ECF Nos. 537 and 539 (FUS)]; and Appendix of Exhibits to Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Complaint [ECF Nos. 538 and 540 (FUS)].
2. On January 3, 2022, the parties submitted a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Second Amended Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order, and Extensions of Time for Briefing (First Requests). ECF No. 550. This Stipulation extended various deadlines in this matter, including extending Defendants' deadline to respond to the Sun's Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Complaint [ECF Nos. 537 and 539 (FUS)] and related motion to seal [ECF No. 536] from January 6, 2022, to January 20, 2022, and extending the Sun's reply deadline to February 10, 2022. See ECF No. 550 at 4, ¶¶ 8(c) and (d).
3. On January 4, 2022, the parties attended a hearing before Special Master Pro and the parties' Joint Stipulation at ECF No. 550 was granted, including extending Defendants' deadline to respond to the Sun's Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Complaint [ECF Nos. 537 and 539 (FUS)] and related motion to seal [ECF No. 536] from January 6, 2022, to January 20, 2022, and extending the Sun's reply deadline to February 10, 2022. See ECF Nos. 552 and 554.
4. On January 20, 2022, an Order was entered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Ferenbach granting Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Complaint [ECF No. 537], Motion to Seal [ECF No. 536], and Sealed Motion [ECF No. 539] due to no responses being filed 2 by January 6, 2022. ECF No. 561.
5. Because the parties have stipulated to extend Defendants' response deadline to ECF Nos. 536, 537, and 539 to January 20, 2022, and the Sun's reply deadline to February 10, 2022, which was ordered by the Special Master, the parties submit this stipulation to vacate the Order entered at ECF No. 561. The parties have notified Special Master Pro of ECF No. 561 and he is aware that the parties are submitting this Joint Stipulation.
Stipulations addressing issues other than matters referred to the Special Master must be filed separately to be reviewed by the presiding Judge.
IT IS SO ORDERED: 3