Opinion
2:22-cv-00047-RFB-BNW
01-20-2022
LAS VEGAS SKYDIVING ADVENTURES, LLC, a Nevada limited-liability company; Plaintiff, v. GROUPON, INC., a Delaware corporation; DOES I through X, inclusive; ROE CORPORATION I, Defendants.
GIBSON LEXBURY LLP, STEVEN A. GIBSON, ROMAN NIKHMAN, DANIEL E. JOSLYN, Counsel for Plaintiff Las Vegas Skydiving Adventures, LLC GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, MARK E. FERRARIO, TYLER ANDREWS Counsel for Defendant Groupon, Inc.
GIBSON LEXBURY LLP, STEVEN A. GIBSON, ROMAN NIKHMAN, DANIEL E. JOSLYN, Counsel for Plaintiff Las Vegas Skydiving Adventures, LLC
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, MARK E. FERRARIO, TYLER ANDREWS Counsel for Defendant Groupon, Inc.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR GROUPON, INC. TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT [FIRST REQUEST]
BRENDA WEKSLER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff Las Vegas Skydiving Adventure, LLC, and Defendant Groupon, Inc. (“Groupon”) by and through their respective counsel of record, and pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Groupon's response to the Complaint in this action (currently due on February 2, 2022) by three (3) weeks, through and including February 23, 2022, and request that the Court enter an order approving the same. This extension is requested so that Groupon, Inc. may fully investigate the Complaint, and due to schedule conflicts of counsel. This request is not for purposes of delay.
Should Groupon's response to the Complaint include a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12, the parties further stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Plaintiffs response to such motion by three (3) weeks beyond the standard opposition deadline outlined in Local Rule 7-2.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that ECF No. 5 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is granted to the extent that Groupon's deadline to respond to the complaint is extended. It is denied without prejudice to the extent the parties seek to extend Plaintiff's response deadline to a potential motion to dismiss, as this stipulation must be filed as a separate request. See LR IC 2-2(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED