Opinion
2:22-cv-00461-JCM-BNW
02-22-2023
LAS VEGAS SANDS, INC. n/k/a LAS VEGAS SANDS, LLC; and LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., Defendant.
KEMP JONES, LLP J. RANDALL JONES, ESQ. (#1927) MICHAEL J. GAYAN, ESQ. (#11135) COHEN ZIFFER FRENCHMAN & MCKENNA LLP ROBIN L. COHEN, ESQ. (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) MAI·C T. LADD, ESQ. (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) ALEXANDER M. SUGZDA, ESQ. (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) JASON D. MEYERS, ESQ. (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS BAUTE CROCHETIERE & HARTLEY LLP MICHAEL J. HAIILEY, ESQ. (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) COMINEY A. PALKO, ESQ. (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) HEJMANOWSKI & MCCREA LLC PAUL R. HEJMANOWSKI, ESQ. (#94) CHARLES H. MCCREA, ESQ. (#104) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA
KEMP JONES, LLP J. RANDALL JONES, ESQ. (#1927) MICHAEL J. GAYAN, ESQ. (#11135) COHEN ZIFFER FRENCHMAN & MCKENNA LLP ROBIN L. COHEN, ESQ. (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) MAI·C T. LADD, ESQ. (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) ALEXANDER M. SUGZDA, ESQ. (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) JASON D. MEYERS, ESQ. (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
BAUTE CROCHETIERE & HARTLEY LLP MICHAEL J. HAIILEY, ESQ. (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) COMINEY A. PALKO, ESQ. (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) HEJMANOWSKI & MCCREA LLC PAUL R. HEJMANOWSKI, ESQ. (#94) CHARLES H. MCCREA, ESQ. (#104) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO WITHDRAW PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, WITHOUT PREJUDICE [ECF #47] (FIRST REQUEST)
Plaintiffs Las Vegas Sands, Inc. n/k/a Las Vegas Sands, LLC, and Las Vegas Sands Corp. (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. (“National Union”) (collectively the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the Court's approval, to withdraw Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (“MPSJ”) (ECF No. 47), without prejudice, as follows:
1. On December 23, 2022, National Union filed its Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses and Document Production (“Motion to Compel”). ECF No. 46.
2. On that same day, Plaintiffs filed their MPSJ and Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Plaintiffs' MPSJ (“Motion to Stay”). ECF Nos. 47, 50.
3. By Court order, Plaintiffs' reply was due February 17, 2023. ECF No. 58.
4. On February 17, 2023, Magistrate Judge Weksler heard and ruled on the Parties' discovery motions. Magistrate Judge Weksler denied Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay (ECF No. 50) and granted National Union's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 46). ECF No. 73.
5. In light of these discovery mlings, Plaintiffs hereby withdraw their MPSJ (ECF No. 47), without prejudice. National Union does not oppose the withdrawal without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.