From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Las Vegas 26 Holdings, LLC v. Churchill Mra Funding I, LLC

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 16, 2024
CV 23-10742-JFW(RAOx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2024)

Opinion

CV 23-10742-JFW(RAOx)

01-16-2024

Las Vegas 26 Holdings, LLC v. Churchill MRA Funding I, LLC, et al.


PRESENT:

HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED TO LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT

On April 27, 2023, Plaintiff Las Vegas 26 Holdings, LLC (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against multiple defendants in Los Angeles Superior Court, solely alleging state law causes of action. On July 7, 2023, Cross-Complainant Sunrise NPL, LLC (“Sunrise NPL”) filed a Verified First Amended Cross-Complaint against multiple cross-defendants, including First Republic Bank. In the CrossComplaint, the Eighth Cause of Action for Unjust Enrichment is asserted against “All CrossDefendants,” including First Republic Bank. On May 1, 2023, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation closed First Republic Bank and appointed the FDIC as Receiver. The FDIC accepted the appointment on May 1, 2023. On December 22, 2023, the FDIC in its capacity as Receiver for First Republic Bank (“FDIC-R”) filed a Notice of Substitution as Receiver for First Republic Bank and a Notice of Removal, removing the action to this Court pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1819(b)(2)(B). Just three weeks later, on January 12, 2024, pursuant to the stipulation of Sunrise NPL and FDIC-R, FDIC-R was dismissed from this action.

In light of FDIC-R's dismissal from this action, the Court orders the parties to show cause, in writing, on or before January 22, 2024, why this court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining claims and remand this action to Los Angeles County Superior Court. No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the remand of this action to Los Angeles Superior Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Las Vegas 26 Holdings, LLC v. Churchill Mra Funding I, LLC

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 16, 2024
CV 23-10742-JFW(RAOx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Las Vegas 26 Holdings, LLC v. Churchill Mra Funding I, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Las Vegas 26 Holdings, LLC v. Churchill MRA Funding I, LLC, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 16, 2024

Citations

CV 23-10742-JFW(RAOx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2024)