From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LaRue v. Tiernan, Borrman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 27, 1941
33 N.E.2d 239 (N.Y. 1941)

Opinion

Argued January 14, 1941

Decided February 27, 1941

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, BREWSTER, J.

Ellis J. Staley for appellants.

J. Edmund Kelly and Charles A. Murphy for Mae LaRue, respondent. Andrew J. Hanmer and Seward E. Hanmer for Mahlon Tiernan, respondent.


Judgments affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ.


Summaries of

LaRue v. Tiernan, Borrman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 27, 1941
33 N.E.2d 239 (N.Y. 1941)
Case details for

LaRue v. Tiernan, Borrman

Case Details

Full title:MAE LaRUE, Respondent, v. MAHLON TIERNAN, Defendant, and FRANCIS BORRMAN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 27, 1941

Citations

33 N.E.2d 239 (N.Y. 1941)
33 N.E.2d 239

Citing Cases

Salsbury v. United Parcel Service

Double parking is a violation of an ordinance not a statute, and as such is not negligence per se but is…

Salsbury v. United Parcel Serv.

regulations do not exclude a truck from double parking even when it is actually and expeditiously engaged in…