From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Larson v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 28, 2008
No. 2:06-cv-1413 ALA P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2008)

Opinion

No. 2:06-cv-1413 ALA P.

February 28, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff Harvey Eugene Larson is a state prisoner who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 25, 2008, this Court granted Defendants' motion for summary judgment and closed the matter.

On February 25, 2008, Mr. Larson filed a document entitled "Notice of Appeal and Extension of Time to File Appeal" (Doc. 94). However, the Notice of Appeal was timely filed on February 25, 2008, within 30 days after judgment was entered (Doc. 95). See Fed.R.App.P. 4(a) (providing that the notice of appeal "must be filed with the district court clerk within 30 days after the judgment or order appealed from is entered"); Fed.R.App.P. 4(c)(1) (providing that if "an inmate confined in an institution files a notice of appeal . . . the notice is timely if it is deposited in the institution's internal mail system on or before the last day for filing").

Therefore, to the extent that Mr. Larson is requesting an extension of time to file a notice of appeal, his request is DENIED as moot.


Summaries of

Larson v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 28, 2008
No. 2:06-cv-1413 ALA P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2008)
Case details for

Larson v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:HARVEY EUGENE LARSON, Plaintiff, v. D.L. RUNNELS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 28, 2008

Citations

No. 2:06-cv-1413 ALA P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2008)