From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Larson v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 4, 2008
No. CIV S-07-0806 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0806 FCD DAD P.

February 4, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On December 21, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 21, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed for plaintiff's failure to state a cognizable claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).


Summaries of

Larson v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 4, 2008
No. CIV S-07-0806 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2008)
Case details for

Larson v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:HARVEY EUGENE LARSON, Plaintiff, v. RUNNELS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 4, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-0806 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2008)

Citing Cases

Larson v. Carrasco

Plaintiff has been informed in at least one other case that he is subject to § 1915(g). The cases include…

Larson v. ALN

II. DISCUSSION The Court takes judicial notice of three of Plaintiff's prior lawsuits that were dismissed as…