Opinion
No. 6:11-cv-6415-TC
02-05-2013
FRED A. LARSEN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Social Security Administration, Defendant.
ORDER
AIKEN, Chief Judge:
Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on December 4, 2012. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When a party objects to any portion of the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).
Plaintiff has timely filed objections. I have, therefore, given the file of this case a de novo review. I ADOPT the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation (doc. 22) and affirm the Commissioner's decision. IT IS SO ORDERED.
________________________
Ann Aiken
United States District Judge