From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Larraceleta v. Darling-Delaware Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 1995
221 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 13, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cannavo, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

In order to state a prima facie case of negligence, the plaintiffs must demonstrate that the defendant created the condition which caused the injury or that it had actual or constructive notice of the condition (see, Capitelli v King Kullen Grocery Co., 207 A.D.2d 325; Batiancela v Staten Is. Mall, 189 A.D.2d 743). Here, even if we view the evidence in a light most favorable to the plaintiffs, such a demonstration was not made. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment. Balletta, J.P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Larraceleta v. Darling-Delaware Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 1995
221 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Larraceleta v. Darling-Delaware Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOSE LARRACELETA et al., Appellants, v. DARLING-DELAWARE COMPANY, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 1012