From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Larouere v. Larouere

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 1, 1984
453 So. 2d 516 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-1751.

August 1, 1984.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hillsborough County; Morrison Buck, Judge.

Everett Q. Jones, Tampa, for appellant.

W. Craig Hall and Albert M. Salem, Jr. of Salem, Musial Morse, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.


From the record before us, we hold that there was no error in the trial court proceedings. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion and he made a proper decision. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1202-1203 (Fla. 1980); Monnar v. Monnar, 422 So.2d 362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Dominik v. Dominik, 390 So.2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Although the marital property was distributed according to the formula set forth in Landay v. Landay, 400 So.2d 43 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), it comports with that formula approved in Landay v. Landay, 429 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1983).

AFFIRMED.

DANAHY and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Larouere v. Larouere

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 1, 1984
453 So. 2d 516 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Larouere v. Larouere

Case Details

Full title:MAUREEN S. LAROUERE, APPELLANT, v. JAMES U. LAROUERE, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 1, 1984

Citations

453 So. 2d 516 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)