From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LaRose v. Possehl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1936
247 App. Div. 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

February, 1936.


Action by a member of a local union to obtain a vacatur of his suspension and the restoration of his rights and to restrain the defendants in respect thereto. Order denying motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff has an adequate remedy within his organization and has failed to exhaust this remedy and that the court has no jurisdiction herein, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

LaRose v. Possehl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1936
247 App. Div. 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

LaRose v. Possehl

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD J. LaROSE, Respondent, v. JOHN POSSEHL, Appellant, and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1936

Citations

247 App. Div. 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)