Opinion
WD 83140
07-28-2020
Nathan LAROSE and Natalie LaRose, Appellants, v. Robbie Eugene MCCARTER BY Lloyd MCCARTER, Next Friend and Guardian, Respondent.
Andrew Gelbach and Samuel Gonzalez, Warrensburg, MO, Attorneys for Appellants. Mark D. Chuning and Todd C. Barrett, Kansas City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.
Andrew Gelbach and Samuel Gonzalez, Warrensburg, MO, Attorneys for Appellants.
Mark D. Chuning and Todd C. Barrett, Kansas City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.
Before Division Two: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, and Anthony Rex Gabbert and W. Douglas Thomson, Judges
Order
Per Curiam: Husband and wife, Nathan and Natalie LaRose, appeal the judgment awarding them damages as a result of injuries Nathan suffered in a car accident. The LaRoses raise three points on appeal. They argue that the judgment (1) misapplied the law in failing to award Nathan the costs of future hip revision surgeries; (2) was against the weight of the evidence in failing to award such costs; and (3) failed to state the applicable post-judgment interest rate under § 408.040. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
In places, we use the LaRoses’ first names for ease of reference; no familiarity or disrespect is intended.
--------