From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LaRosa Realty, Inc. v. Kim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 27, 1986
123 A.D.2d 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

October 27, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The agreement herein provided that the broker's commission was due and payable "if, as, and when title [passed and] full consideration [was] paid, except for willful default on the part of the seller, in which case the commission would be payable on demand". As it is undisputed that these conditions precedent did not occur, the plaintiff would only be entitled to its commission if it were shown that the sellers willfully defaulted under a binding sales contract (see, Graff v Billet, 101 A.D.2d 355, affd 64 N.Y.2d 899).

It is clear from the record that no signed contract was ever delivered to the purchaser, even though it had been signed by the sellers. The sale fell through during the contract closing. The disagreement that resulted in the collapse of the sale was over postclosing possession. The parties therefore tore their signatures from the contract and the down payment check was returned. Thus, absent a contract of sale, the sellers were not liable for a commission (see, Graff v Billet, supra). Mollen, P.J., Lazer, Bracken and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

LaRosa Realty, Inc. v. Kim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 27, 1986
123 A.D.2d 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

LaRosa Realty, Inc. v. Kim

Case Details

Full title:LaROSA REALTY, INC., Respondent, v. J. KIM et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 27, 1986

Citations

123 A.D.2d 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Battery Park Realty, Inc. v. Delaware, Inc.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. Although it is generally the case that a real estate broker…