From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Larkin v. Larkin

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jul 19, 2023
2:23-cv-144-JLB-NPM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 19, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-144-JLB-NPM

07-19-2023

Aria Larkin, Plaintiff, v. JOHN P. LARKIN, II, JP II, INC, BARBARA R. BLACKMAN, LYNN, LYNN, BLACKMAN AND MANITSKY, P.C., GADUE'S DRY CLEANING, PUBLIC STORAGE CORPORATE and UNKNOWN/UNNAMED DEFENDANTS, Defendants.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

NICHOLAS P. MIZELL UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Aria Larkin-proceeding without a lawyer-has sued various defendants for a variety of claims. But with no apparent personal jurisdiction over the defendants, and because Larkin has not diligently prosecuted this case, this action should be dismissed without prejudice.

The court found Larkin financially eligible to proceed in forma pauperis but found her complaint deficient under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). (Doc. 12). Among other reasons, personal jurisdiction appeared unlikely and venue improper. Nevertheless, the court provided Larkin an opportunity to file an amended complaint by July 12, 2023. (Doc. 12). The clerk mailed copies of that order to Larkin on June 12, 2023. But this deadline has come and gone, and Larkin has failed to comply. So a dismissal without prejudice is appropriate. See Rowe v. Barry, No. 8:15-cv-2158-T-33EAJ, 2016 WL 367871, *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 29, 2016) (denying IFP and dismissing complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction); Ricketts v. Arch, No. CIVA 207cv-00082-RWS, 2007 WL 3143722, *1 (N.D.Ga. Oct. 24, 2007) (finding case was frivolous under 28 U.SC. § 1915(e)(2)(B) given plaintiff failed to provide a basis for personal jurisdiction); Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962) (observing the court's “inherent power” to dismiss a case for lack of prosecution under its authority to manage its docket).

NOTICE TO PARTIES

A party has fourteen days from this date to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation's factual findings and legal conclusions. A party's failure to file written objections “waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions.” See 11th Cir. R. 3-1. To expedite resolution, parties may file a joint notice waiving the 14-day objection period.


Summaries of

Larkin v. Larkin

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jul 19, 2023
2:23-cv-144-JLB-NPM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 19, 2023)
Case details for

Larkin v. Larkin

Case Details

Full title:Aria Larkin, Plaintiff, v. JOHN P. LARKIN, II, JP II, INC, BARBARA R…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Jul 19, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-144-JLB-NPM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 19, 2023)