holding that since Virginia statute did not create a trust res or impose trust responsibilities, debtor who was president of company issuing defaulted securities was not in fiduciary relationship
Summary of this case from In re Bruce91-1136, 91-1145.
November 15, 1991.
Appeal from and Citation D.Md., 769 F.Supp. 919.
DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS — AFFIRMED.
holding that since Virginia statute did not create a trust res or impose trust responsibilities, debtor who was president of company issuing defaulted securities was not in fiduciary relationship
Summary of this case from In re Bruceholding that since Virginia statute did not create a trust res or impose trust responsibilities, debtor who was president of company issuing defaulted securities was not in fiduciary relationship
Summary of this case from IN RE KANGholding that since Virginia statute did not create a trust res or impose trust responsibilities, debtor who was president of company issuing defaulted securities was not in fiduciary relationship
Summary of this case from In re McKnewconcluding that "to the extent the complaint seeks damages from appellees [(state officers)] in their official capacities, it is barred"
Summary of this case from Portee v. FelderFull title:Larkin v. Baltimore Bancorp
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Date published: Nov 15, 1991
Accordingly, to obtain relief under Section 523(a)(4), Plaintiff "must establish that [Defendants were]…
Li v. Chu (In re Chu)Accordingly, to obtain relief under Section 523(a)(4), Plaintiff "must establish that [Defendants were]…