From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Larios-Alvarez v. Lynch

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 29, 2015
616 F. App'x 118 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-1033

09-29-2015

JOSE LUIS LARIOS-ALVAREZ, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.

Jay S. Marks, Lauren Gold, LAW OFFICES OF JAY S. MARKS, LLC, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, John S. Hogan, Assistant Director, Jonathan Robbins, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Before MOTZ, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jay S. Marks, Lauren Gold, LAW OFFICES OF JAY S. MARKS, LLC, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, John S. Hogan, Assistant Director, Jonathan Robbins, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jose Luis Larios-Alvarez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge's denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the parties' Joint Statement of Agreed Facts and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board's decision. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re: Larios-Alvarez (B.I.A. Dec. 19, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

Larios-Alvarez v. Lynch

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 29, 2015
616 F. App'x 118 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Larios-Alvarez v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:JOSE LUIS LARIOS-ALVAREZ, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 29, 2015

Citations

616 F. App'x 118 (4th Cir. 2015)