From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laribee v. City of Rome

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 1998
254 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 2, 1998

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Shaheen, J. — Summary Judgment.

Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Wisner, Balio and Fallon, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motion of City of Rome, Rome Hospital Murphy Memorial Hospital and Rome Hospital Obstetrical Center (defendants) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them. Defendants established that the treating physicians were not their employees and that defendants thus are not vicariously liable ( see, Hill v. St. Clare's Hosp., 67 N.Y.2d 72, 79).


Summaries of

Laribee v. City of Rome

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 1998
254 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Laribee v. City of Rome

Case Details

Full title:MELISSA A. LARIBEE et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF ROME et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 2, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
678 N.Y.S.2d 565

Citing Cases

Orphan v. Pilnik

This Court, however, has consistently held that expert testimony is not necessary on the issue whether a…

Moticik v. Sisters Healthcare

In opposition to defendants' motion, plaintiff submitted the redacted affidavit of an expert witness. We…