From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lara v. State

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jan 16, 2014
NO. 02-13-00561-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 16, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 02-13-00561-CR

01-16-2014

RUTH MAREE LARA APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE


FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Ruth Maree Lara attempts to appeal from her conviction for possession of less than one gram of heroin. The trial court's certification states that this is "a plea-bargained case and the defendant has NO right of appeal." See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). On November 21, 2013, we notified Lara that the appeal would be dismissed pursuant to the trial court's certification unless she or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response on or before December 2, 2013, showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. We have not received a response. Therefore, in accordance with the trial court's certification, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J. DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Lara v. State

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jan 16, 2014
NO. 02-13-00561-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 16, 2014)
Case details for

Lara v. State

Case Details

Full title:RUTH MAREE LARA APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Jan 16, 2014

Citations

NO. 02-13-00561-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 16, 2014)

Citing Cases

Zuniga v. State

Therefore, because our record does not contain a certification from the trial court showing that appellant…