From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laponte v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 13, 2007
No. CIV S-05-0996 GEB CMK P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-0996 GEB CMK P.

March 13, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's February 28, 2007 request for the appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Laponte v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 13, 2007
No. CIV S-05-0996 GEB CMK P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2007)
Case details for

Laponte v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:JOHN LAPONTE, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS L. CAREY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 13, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-05-0996 GEB CMK P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2007)