From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lanzone v. Cariola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 20, 1952
279 App. Div. 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

March 20, 1952.

Present — Taylor, P.J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.


Judgment and orders affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: On the record before us, it clearly appears that the plaintiffs unnecessarily neglected for approximately six years to take any proceedings to enter judgment upon the defendant's default, although in their power to do so. No sufficient reason is shown excusing such neglect. Under the circumstances, the judgment and orders appealed from should be affirmed. We treat the motion as having been made under rule 302 of the Rules of Civil Practice. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment and order of Monroe Special Term, granting dismissal of plaintiff's complaint for failure to prosecute an action in negligence brought in 1939; also appeal from order of Monroe Special Term, denying plaintiff's motion to vacate the previous order and for a reargument of such motion.)


Summaries of

Lanzone v. Cariola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 20, 1952
279 App. Div. 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Lanzone v. Cariola

Case Details

Full title:NICK S. LANZONE et al., as Administrators of the Estate of JOSEPH RICCI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 20, 1952

Citations

279 App. Div. 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Citing Cases

Manzi v. Central N.Y. Wire Corp.

( Balaka v. Stork Restaurant, 3 A.D.2d 857. ) He has failed to meet either of these requirements. This court…