From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lanzo v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Sep 16, 2021
248 N.J. 247 (N.J. 2021)

Opinion

C-3 September Term 2021 085772

09-16-2021

Stephen LANZO, III and Kendra Lanzo, Plaintiffs-Petitioners, v. CYPRUS AMAX MINERALS COMPANY, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to American Talc Company, et al., Defendants, and Imerys Talc America, Inc., f/k/a Luzenac America, Inc., Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Windsor Minerals, Inc., Defendant, and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., f/k/a Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc., Defendant-Respondent.


ORDER

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-005717-17 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.


Summaries of

Lanzo v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Sep 16, 2021
248 N.J. 247 (N.J. 2021)
Case details for

Lanzo v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co.

Case Details

Full title:Stephen LANZO, III and Kendra Lanzo, Plaintiffs-Petitioners, v. CYPRUS…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Sep 16, 2021

Citations

248 N.J. 247 (N.J. 2021)
248 N.J. 247