From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lanzetta v. Madori

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 16, 2008
55 A.D.3d 376 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 4269.

October 16, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Patricia A. Williams, J.), entered July 30, 2007, which, in an action for personal injuries, granted the motions of defendants Washburn and Demauro for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against them and denied plaintiffs' cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Schiavetti, Corgan, DiEdwards Nicholson, LLP, White Plains (Anne Marie Tormay of counsel), for appellants.

Anita Nissan Yehuda, Roslyn Heights, for Morgan Washburn, respondent. Law Office of John P. Humphreys, New York (Eric P. Tosca and Denise L. Thomas of counsel), for Mari Demauro, respondent.

Before: Lippman, P.J., Andrias, Buckley, Sweeny and Renwick, JJ.


Defendant Dominick Madori, a teenager, accidentally shot his teenage companion, plaintiff Andrew Lanzetta, in the eye with a paintball gun that he had left on a prior occasion in their friend defendant Washburn's bedroom closet. The undisputed evidence was that Washburn lacked actual knowledge the paintball gun was there, and there was no evidence as to how long the gun was in the closet so as to charge her with constructive notice of its presence ( see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836). Although the accident took place in her home during her absence, Washburn's mother, defendant Demauro, was not liable for negligent supervision of her daughter and her daughter's friends, since the accident was unforeseeable in light of her lack of awareness of the presence of the paintball gun ( see Rios v Smith, 95 NY2d 647, 652; LaTorre v Genesee Mgt, 90 NY2d 576, 581-582). Nor was there evidence that Demauro was aware of any dangerous propensities of her daughter's friends ( see Rivers v Murray, 29 AD3d 884).


Summaries of

Lanzetta v. Madori

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 16, 2008
55 A.D.3d 376 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Lanzetta v. Madori

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW LANZETTA et al., Appellants, v. DOMINICK MADORI et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 16, 2008

Citations

55 A.D.3d 376 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 7773
867 N.Y.S.2d 43

Citing Cases

Chern v. Leclerc

She must show that defendant parents exercised care or control of their son, even though he was an adult;…

Alotta v. Diaz

"The degree of supervision, however, depends on the surrounding circumstances and, in general, younger…