From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lanza v. Lanza

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec 13, 2017
233 So. 3d 1248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

No. 3D17–379

12-13-2017

Teresita Abadin LANZA, Appellant, v. Carlos LANZA, Appellee.

Perez–Abreu & Martin–Lavielle, P.A., and Andy W. Acosta and Javier Perez–Abreu, for appellant. Greene Smith Jean, P.A., and Cynthia L. Greene, Laura Davis Smith, and Alicia M. De La O, for appellee.


Perez–Abreu & Martin–Lavielle, P.A., and Andy W. Acosta and Javier Perez–Abreu, for appellant.

Greene Smith Jean, P.A., and Cynthia L. Greene, Laura Davis Smith, and Alicia M. De La O, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and LOGUE and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's abatement of alimony and child support. We do so with the understanding that the trial court's oral pronouncement at the hearing allows the former wife to conduct discovery and, if necessary, seek relief from the trial court in relation to the propriety, amount, and duration of the abatement.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Lanza v. Lanza

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec 13, 2017
233 So. 3d 1248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Lanza v. Lanza

Case Details

Full title:Teresita Abadin LANZA, Appellant, v. Carlos LANZA, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Dec 13, 2017

Citations

233 So. 3d 1248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)