Opinion
22 Civ. 4855 (AT)
11-18-2022
PERICLES LANTZ, Plaintiff, v. WILHELM LIEBENBERG, CAROLINE SIROIS, JONATHAN E. MOSKIN, and John Does 1 - 6, Defendants.
ORDER
ANALISA TORRES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Court has reviewed the parties' revised proposed case management plan. ECF No. 41. The parties' proposed deadline for the close of fact discovery exceeds 120 days. Id. ¶ 5. To the extent this proposed deadline is intended to account for Defendants' “request [for] specific time to conduct discovery from foreign third parties concerning anticipated affirmative defenses,” id. ¶ 13, that request is DENIED without prejudice to renewal because it is not properly before the Court in a proposed case management plan. The same is true of Defendants' request for two separate hearings to “address Plaintiff s refusal to return improperly obtained attorney-client privileged documents” and “address the duplicative nature of the claims in this action and in the action before Judge Hellerstein: Laba v. JBO Worldwide Supply Pty Ltd. 1:20-cv-03443-AKH.” Id. Neither of these requests is properly before the Court. Accordingly, both requests are DENIED without prejudice to renewal.
Accordingly, by November 21, 2022, the parties shall submit a second revised proposed case management plan that includes a revised deadline for the close of fact discovery that does not exceed 120 days. No extensions shall be gr anted without a showing of good cause.
SO ORDERED.