From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lantigua v. Lopes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 9, 1997
696 So. 2d 532 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case Nos. 96-2392 96-3536

Opinion filed July 9, 1997.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court of Dade County, Thomas S. Wilson, Jr., Judge.

Kubicki Draper and Angela C. Flowers, for appellant.

Simon, Nelson Ruggiero, Ronald M. Simon, William C. Ruggiero; Lauri Waldman Ross, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., COPE and GODERICH, JJ.


We affirm the final judgment under review. With regard to the appellees' motion for appellate attorney's fees, pursuant to sections 768.79(1) and 59.46, Florida Statutes (1995), the fees sought are granted.

In the case of Metropolitan Dade County v. Cerezo, 21 Fla. L. Weekly D984 (Fla. 3d DCA April 24, 1996), we considered this issue and wrote an opinion. That opinion never became final because the appeal was subsequently dismissed. Nonetheless, the observations made therein are totally applicable and appropriate to the facts of this case and are reproduced below, in relevant part:

The opinion in Cerezo never became final and has never been released for publication in the permanent law reports because after the opinion was issued, but before the time for rehearing expired and the mandate issued, the parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal. This Court recognized the stipulation and dismissed the appeal. See Metropolitan Dade County v. Cerezo, 674 So.2d 138 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

We write only to address the appellee's motion to tax attorney's fees, pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes (1989), and to note that we align ourselves with the First, Second, Fourth and Fifth District Courts of Appeal, and grant the appellee's motion for appellate attorney's fees and costs based on sections 768.79(1) and 59.46, Florida Statutes (1989). See Westfield Ins. Co. v. Mendolera, 647 So.2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Mark C. Arnold Constr. Co. v. National Lumber Brokers, Inc., 642 So.2d 576 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Schmidt v. Fortner, 629 So.2d 1036, 1043 n.10 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Williams v. Brochu, 578 So.2d 491, 495 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). Thus, we remand the cause to the trial court to determine the appropriate amount of the award and enter a judgment awarding fees to the appellee.

Cerezo, 21 Fla. L. Weekly at D984.

Accordingly, we grant the appellees' motion for appellate attorney's fees and remand this cause for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Affirmed; attorney's fees granted and remanded.


Summaries of

Lantigua v. Lopes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 9, 1997
696 So. 2d 532 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Lantigua v. Lopes

Case Details

Full title:ENRIQUE MAXIMO LANTIGUA, APPELLANT, vs. MARIA LOPES, JORGE LOPES AND…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 9, 1997

Citations

696 So. 2d 532 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Motter Roofing, Inc., v. Leibowitz

See Hartley v. Guetzloe, 712 So.2d 817 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). This Court, along with all district courts in…