From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lanning v. Wells Fargo Bank

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 24, 2021
20 Civ. 2055 (GBD) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 2021)

Opinion

20 Civ. 2055 (GBD) (GWG)

11-24-2021

MICHAEL LANNING Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. Defendants.


ORDER

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge

The Court has considered the motion for appointment of interim class counsel pursuant to Rule 23(g)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by counsel for plaintiffs Michael Lanning and Marcia Francis (Docket # 26). There has been no other application for appointment and no opposition has been filed to the motion, notwithstanding notice to counsel in a similar suit (Docket ## 52, 54). The Court finds that the proposed attorneys are experienced, qualified to handle employment class actions, and satisfy the criteria listed in Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(g)(1)(A). For the reasons set forth in the memorandum of law accompanying the motion, the Court grants the motion (Docket # 26). Accordingly, Dana Marie Cimera and Brian Scott Schaffer of the law firm Fitapelli & Schaffer, LLP, and Joseph H. Chivers of The Employment Rights Group, LLC are appointed co-interim class counsel pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(g)(3).

SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Lanning v. Wells Fargo Bank

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 24, 2021
20 Civ. 2055 (GBD) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Lanning v. Wells Fargo Bank

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL LANNING Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 24, 2021

Citations

20 Civ. 2055 (GBD) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 2021)