From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lanning v. Sharrett

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Sep 18, 2006
Case No. 2:05-cv-237 (W.D. Mich. Sep. 18, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 2:05-cv-237.

September 18, 2006


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 9, 2006, defendant filed a motion to dismiss for failure to establish exhaustion of administrative remedies. Plaintiff has filed correspondence, dated September, 15, 2006, in which he requests that this case "be dismissed with prejudice." Accordingly, it is recommended that this case be dismissed with prejudice.

The dismissal of a complaint, even a voluntary dismissal, does not eliminate a prisoner's obligation to pay the required filing fees. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) compels the payment of the respective fees at the moment the complaint is filed. A subsequent dismissal does not negate this financial responsibility. McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 607-08 (6th Cir. 1997); In re Prison Litigation Reform Act, 105 F.3d 1131, 1133-34 (6th Cir. 1997).

NOTICE TO PARTIES: Objections to this Report and Recommendation must be served on opposing parties and filed with the Clerk of the Court within ten (10) days of receipt of this Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); W.D. Mich. LCivR 72.3. Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of any further right to appeal. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). See also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).


Summaries of

Lanning v. Sharrett

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Sep 18, 2006
Case No. 2:05-cv-237 (W.D. Mich. Sep. 18, 2006)
Case details for

Lanning v. Sharrett

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL LANNING, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN SHARRETT, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division

Date published: Sep 18, 2006

Citations

Case No. 2:05-cv-237 (W.D. Mich. Sep. 18, 2006)