Opinion
Argued October 23, 1941 —
Decided January 9, 1942.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 127 N.J.L. 10.
For the appellant, Raymond Chasan.
For the respondents, Charles Hershenstein.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, DONGES, HEHER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.