"In a legal malpractice appeal, the standard of review for this Court when reviewing a district court's grant of summary judgment is well-settled: this Court ‘uses the same standard properly employed by the district court originally ruling on the motion.’ " Ciccarello v. Davies , 166 Idaho 153, 158, 456 P.3d 519, 524 (2019) (quoting Lanham v. Fleenor , 164 Idaho 355, 358, 429 P.3d 1231, 1234 (2018) ). Summary judgment is proper "if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law."
"In a legal malpractice appeal, the standard of review for this Court when reviewing a district court's grant of summary judgment is well-settled: this Court ‘uses the same standard properly employed by the district court originally ruling on the motion.’ " Lanham v. Fleenor , 164 Idaho 355, 358, 429 P.3d 1231, 1234 (2018) (quoting Jordan v. Beeks, 135 Idaho 586, 589, 21 P.3d 908, 911 (2001) ). "The court must grant summary
This Court "uses the same standard properly employed by the district court originally ruling on the motion" when reviewing a district court's grant of summary judgment. Ciccarello v. Davies , 166 Idaho 153, 158, 456 P.3d 519, 524 (2019) (quoting Lanham v. Fleenor, 164 Idaho 355, 358, 429 P.3d 1231, 1234 (2018) ). The court must grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
"[T]he standard of review for this Court when reviewing a district court's grant of summary judgment is well-settled: this Court ‘uses the same standard properly employed by the district court originally ruling on the motion.’ " Lanham v. Fleenor , 164 Idaho 355, 358, 429 P.3d 1231, 1234 (2018) (quoting Jordan v. Beeks , 135 Idaho 586, 589, 21 P.3d 908, 911 (2001) ). "The court must grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law."