Lanham v. Fleenor

4 Citing cases

  1. Rich v. Hepworth Holzer, LLP

    172 Idaho 696 (Idaho 2023)   Cited 2 times

    "In a legal malpractice appeal, the standard of review for this Court when reviewing a district court's grant of summary judgment is well-settled: this Court ‘uses the same standard properly employed by the district court originally ruling on the motion.’ " Ciccarello v. Davies , 166 Idaho 153, 158, 456 P.3d 519, 524 (2019) (quoting Lanham v. Fleenor , 164 Idaho 355, 358, 429 P.3d 1231, 1234 (2018) ). Summary judgment is proper "if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law."

  2. Ciccarello v. Davies

    166 Idaho 153 (Idaho 2019)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that an expert witness disclosure in a legal malpractice case is not the same as a sworn declaration or affidavit

    "In a legal malpractice appeal, the standard of review for this Court when reviewing a district court's grant of summary judgment is well-settled: this Court ‘uses the same standard properly employed by the district court originally ruling on the motion.’ " Lanham v. Fleenor , 164 Idaho 355, 358, 429 P.3d 1231, 1234 (2018) (quoting Jordan v. Beeks, 135 Idaho 586, 589, 21 P.3d 908, 911 (2001) ). "The court must grant summary

  3. Idaho Dep't of Fin. v. Zarinegar

    167 Idaho 611 (Idaho 2020)   Cited 13 times

    This Court "uses the same standard properly employed by the district court originally ruling on the motion" when reviewing a district court's grant of summary judgment. Ciccarello v. Davies , 166 Idaho 153, 158, 456 P.3d 519, 524 (2019) (quoting Lanham v. Fleenor, 164 Idaho 355, 358, 429 P.3d 1231, 1234 (2018) ). The court must grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

  4. Drakos v. Sandow

    167 Idaho 159 (Idaho 2020)   Cited 13 times

    "[T]he standard of review for this Court when reviewing a district court's grant of summary judgment is well-settled: this Court ‘uses the same standard properly employed by the district court originally ruling on the motion.’ " Lanham v. Fleenor , 164 Idaho 355, 358, 429 P.3d 1231, 1234 (2018) (quoting Jordan v. Beeks , 135 Idaho 586, 589, 21 P.3d 908, 911 (2001) ). "The court must grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law."