From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Langstroth v. J.C. Turner Cypress Lumber Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 3, 1917
116 N.E. 1057 (N.Y. 1917)

Opinion

Argued March 14, 1917

Decided April 3, 1917

Arthur O. Townsend and Harcourt Bull for appellant.

D. Theodore Kelly and F. Ferris Hewitt for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., COLLIN, CARDOZO, POUND, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ. Not sitting: McLAUGHLIN, J.


Summaries of

Langstroth v. J.C. Turner Cypress Lumber Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 3, 1917
116 N.E. 1057 (N.Y. 1917)
Case details for

Langstroth v. J.C. Turner Cypress Lumber Company

Case Details

Full title:FRANCIS D. LANGSTROTH, Respondent, v . J.C. TURNER CYPRESS LUMBER COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 3, 1917

Citations

116 N.E. 1057 (N.Y. 1917)
116 N.E. 1057

Citing Cases

Karnal v. Horovitz

e decision of the question presented are thus summarized by CARDOZO, Ch. J., in the leading case of Irvmor…

Mandell v. Moses

It is to be considered solely as the agent for those who came in and participated under the contract. (…