From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Langston v. Hayden

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Apr 29, 2020
No. 04-19-00821-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 29, 2020)

Opinion

No. 04-19-00821-CV

04-29-2020

Larry LANGSTON, Appellant v. Tom HAYDEN and Shirley Hayden, Appellees


MEMORANDUM OPINION

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Guadalupe County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2019-CV-0211
Honorable Bill Squires, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant's brief was due to be filed by February 6, 2020. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time was filed. By order dated March 11, 2020, appellant was ordered to show cause in writing by March 26, 2020, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). Appellant did not respond to this court's order. Because appellant failed to timely file a brief in this appeal, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

Langston v. Hayden

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Apr 29, 2020
No. 04-19-00821-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 29, 2020)
Case details for

Langston v. Hayden

Case Details

Full title:Larry LANGSTON, Appellant v. Tom HAYDEN and Shirley Hayden, Appellees

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Apr 29, 2020

Citations

No. 04-19-00821-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 29, 2020)