From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Langsam v. Tindera

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Jan 22, 1990
64 Ohio App. 3d 228 (Ohio Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 57812.

Decided January 22, 1990.

Appeal from the Cleveland Municipal Court.

Thomas A. Sampliner, for appellant.

James M. Tindera, pro se.


We dismiss as moot the plaintiff's appeal. In his single assignment of error, the plaintiff claims that the trial court erred in failing to file findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Civ.R. 52. The record reveals that the trial court filed those requested findings of fact and conclusions of law on June 14, 1989. The trial court retained jurisdiction to make findings of fact and conclusions of law despite the fact that the appeal may have already been filed. Cf. App.R. 9(E); John G. Johnson Sons Constr. Co. v. A-T-O, Inc. (Sept. 1, 1983), Cuyahoga App. No. 44900, unreported, 1983 WL 4673.

Since there is no issue before this court for review, we hereby dismiss the plaintiff's appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

ANN MCMANAMON, C.J., KRUPANSKY and JOHN F. CORRIGAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Langsam v. Tindera

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Jan 22, 1990
64 Ohio App. 3d 228 (Ohio Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Langsam v. Tindera

Case Details

Full title:LANGSAM, Appellant, v. TINDERA, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County

Date published: Jan 22, 1990

Citations

64 Ohio App. 3d 228 (Ohio Ct. App. 1990)
580 N.E.2d 1157

Citing Cases

State v. Diol

Although the findings of fact and conclusions of law were issued after the notice of appeal was filed, we can…

Earth Mobile, Inc. v. U.S. Bank

On August 24, 2022, after appellants had filed their notice of appeal, they filed a "motion for mandatory…