From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lango v. Division Paint Garden Supply Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Second Division
Oct 11, 1966
75 Ill. App. 2d 384 (Ill. App. Ct. 1966)

Summary

In Lango v. Division Paint Garden Supply Co., 75 Ill. App.2d 384, 221 N.E.2d 47 (1st Dist. 1966), the plaintiff was a buyer and therefore was in the distributive chain.

Summary of this case from Hemphill v. Sayers

Opinion

Gen. No. 49,440. (Abstract of Decision.)

October 11, 1966.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. JOSEPH J. DRUCKER, Judge, presiding.

Order dismissing count of plaintiff's complaint reversed and remanded.

Philip H. Corboy and James P. Chapman, of Chicago, for appellant.

Tom L. Yates, of Chicago (Carl E. Abrahamson, of counsel), for appellees.


Not to be published in full.


Summaries of

Lango v. Division Paint Garden Supply Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Second Division
Oct 11, 1966
75 Ill. App. 2d 384 (Ill. App. Ct. 1966)

In Lango v. Division Paint Garden Supply Co., 75 Ill. App.2d 384, 221 N.E.2d 47 (1st Dist. 1966), the plaintiff was a buyer and therefore was in the distributive chain.

Summary of this case from Hemphill v. Sayers
Case details for

Lango v. Division Paint Garden Supply Co.

Case Details

Full title:Anthony Lango, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Division Paint Garden Supply Co., a…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Second Division

Date published: Oct 11, 1966

Citations

75 Ill. App. 2d 384 (Ill. App. Ct. 1966)
221 N.E.2d 47

Citing Cases

Hemphill v. Sayers

Other Illinois cases applying the third-party beneficiary exception involve plaintiffs in the distributive…

Berg v. City of Chicago

Nor, as I have mentioned, did they argue these points in this court. It follows, therefore, that defendants,…