From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Langly v. Stoke

Court of King's Bench Latch's Reports
Jan 1, 1793
1 N.C. 804 (N.C. 1793)

Opinion

(1793.)

The plaintiff counted directly in the time of King James, contra pacem domini regis nunc, etc., and, after verdict non allocatur in arrest of judgment, quia matter of form, if the whole had been omitted, it would not have arrested the judgment after verdict.


agreed to the case put by Davenport, Serj., where a jury were had, at the bar to try the issue in the case of one Drake, and dismissed, because the exception was taken in time. So 2 E., 4, 23; Godb., 399; Noy, 97; Jones, 172.


Summaries of

Langly v. Stoke

Court of King's Bench Latch's Reports
Jan 1, 1793
1 N.C. 804 (N.C. 1793)
Case details for

Langly v. Stoke

Case Details

Full title:LANGLY v. STOKE. — Hill. 3 Car

Court:Court of King's Bench Latch's Reports

Date published: Jan 1, 1793

Citations

1 N.C. 804 (N.C. 1793)